<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan Cryer - Leeds Web Developer &#187; twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancryer.com/tag/twitter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancryer.com</link>
	<description>Dan Cryer - Leeds Web Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:05:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Google Buzz Followup</title>
		<link>http://www.dancryer.com/2010/02/google-buzz-followup</link>
		<comments>http://www.dancryer.com/2010/02/google-buzz-followup#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cryer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancryer.com/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I posted on Wednesday, just as Google Buzz was announced, asking whether Google Buzz was just Google Wave done right. I&#8217;ve now had Google Buzz in my GMail account for just over 24 hours, and I think I can answer the question: Not quite yet. Why? Google Buzz has a lot of the hallmarks of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dancryer.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/google-buzz-logo1.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-459" title="Google Buzz Logo" src="http://www.dancryer.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/google-buzz-logo1.png" alt="Google Buzz Logo" width="286" height="68" /></a>I posted on Wednesday, just as Google Buzz was announced, asking whether <a href="/2010/02/is-google-buzz-just-wave-done-right">Google Buzz was just Google Wave done right</a>. I&#8217;ve now had Google Buzz in my GMail account for just over 24 hours, and I think I can answer the question: Not quite yet.</p>
<p><strong><em>Why?</em></strong></p>
<p>Google Buzz has a lot of the hallmarks of Google Wave. It allows you to easily share a message with your friends, or publicly. It allows you to share links and photos easily. It&#8217;s got a nice UI and expands well on what the competition, Twitter, provides. However, it&#8217;s not as technically cool as Wave. Google Buzz lacks the killer feature of Wave, for me, though I know it&#8217;s going to sound incredibly sad &#8211; it&#8217;s missing the ability to drag and drop pictures from your computer to the internet.</p>
<p>As far as general opinions on Google Buzz go, I like it and think it stands a real chance. If nothing else, it should light some fires under the feet of the Twitter team, which can only be a good thing. Buzz has a few niggles, such alerting me whenever something changes in my stream &#8211; but then not highlighting those changes clearly enough on the resulting page, but I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;ll get sorted quickly enough. Twitter integration is nice, but it&#8217;s too slow to be useful &#8211; I don&#8217;t want to see what people were saying an hour ago.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m intrigued how quickly this blog entry will make it into Buzz. This blog is fed to Twitter, pings various sites on posting, and also has PubSubHubBub integrated. The theory is that it should be near-instant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dancryer.com/2010/02/google-buzz-followup/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google Buzz just Wave done right?</title>
		<link>http://www.dancryer.com/2010/02/is-google-buzz-just-wave-done-right</link>
		<comments>http://www.dancryer.com/2010/02/is-google-buzz-just-wave-done-right#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cryer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancryer.com/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure those of you who read this blog will have heard what Google Buzz is already. If you haven&#8217;t, Buzz is a real time sharing service, much like Twitter. It allows you to post status updates, like Twitter, but what it adds is the ability to share pictures and videos directly. Services like TwitPic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dancryer.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/google-buzz-logo1.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-459" title="google-buzz-logo" src="http://www.dancryer.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/google-buzz-logo1.png" alt="" width="286" height="68" /></a>I&#8217;m sure those of you who read this blog will have heard what Google Buzz is already. If you haven&#8217;t, Buzz is a real time sharing service, much like Twitter. It allows you to post status updates, like Twitter, but what it adds is the ability to share pictures and videos directly. Services like TwitPic are not required. For a bit better introduction to the service, check out the video from their announcement:</p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yi50KlsCBio&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yi50KlsCBio&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div>
<p>As soon as I saw this, it reminded me a lot of Google Wave. It strikes me as a way for Google to push a Wave-like service out in a way that users will understand, since many, <a href="/2009/10/i-dont-get-google-wave">including me</a>, didn&#8217;t have a clue what it was for. I&#8217;m hoping that Google have carried over Wave&#8217;s best features, like the ability to drag and drop photos from your computer to upload. If they have, I think they will be taking away a key barrier to entry for &#8220;normal users&#8221; to get started sharing online, as figuring out how to share pictures on Twitter is hardly simple.</p>
<p>The key difference between Buzz and Wave, for me, is that they&#8217;re not trying to replace a well established system (i.e. email) with a new protocol. They are trying to compete with the current &#8220;trendy&#8221; site, perhaps thinking a little too much of their own influence, but sites come in and out of fashion all the time &#8211; email does not. They&#8217;re also giving it to all GMail users straight away, and allowing you to link it with your Twitter profile, making the potential audience pretty huge.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing how Google Buzz develops, and whether or not anyone actually uses it after the initial&#8230; err, Buzz&#8230; has died down. Of course, my first question is, when&#8217;s the first WordPress &#8220;Buzz New Posts&#8221; plugin coming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dancryer.com/2010/02/is-google-buzz-just-wave-done-right/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Profitable in 2009?</title>
		<link>http://www.dancryer.com/2009/12/twitter-profitable-in-2009</link>
		<comments>http://www.dancryer.com/2009/12/twitter-profitable-in-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cryer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancryer.com/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have a running discussion at work, generally brought up by Ben after a Twitter related story breaks. This is that Twitter&#8217;s great and all, but it doesn&#8217;t make any money. Our generally agreed assumptions have been that Twitter is free-loading off the back of Venture Capital and will flop as soon as it&#8217;s left [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dancryer.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/twitter_logo_outline.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-354" style="margin-left: 15px; margin-bottom: 15px; background: none;" title="Twitter Logo" src="http://www.dancryer.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/twitter_logo_outline-300x78.png" alt="" width="210" height="55" /></a>We have a running discussion at work, generally brought up by <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.restafarian.com/">Ben</a> after a Twitter related story breaks. This is that Twitter&#8217;s great and all, but it doesn&#8217;t make any money. Our generally agreed assumptions have been that Twitter is free-loading off the back of Venture Capital and will flop as soon as it&#8217;s left on it&#8217;s own, since advertising revenue probably couldn&#8217;t support it.</p>
<p>It seems we may be wrong. According to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2009/tc20091220_549879.htm">a report by Business Week</a>, Twitter will be reporting a small profit for 2009. It has done this by cutting costs, such as carrier charges for it&#8217;s SMS services, and by generating new revenue via it&#8217;s deals with Google ($15M) and Microsoft ($10M) for their search integration.</p>
<p>I have to say, I&#8217;m impressed. I didn&#8217;t catch on at the time that they&#8217;d make a lot of money from that, but if the deals have given them the ability to fund their entire yearly operating costs, good work to them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dancryer.com/2009/12/twitter-profitable-in-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome Twitter Extension: TweetPage</title>
		<link>http://www.dancryer.com/2009/10/google-chrome-twitter-extension-tweetpage</link>
		<comments>http://www.dancryer.com/2009/10/google-chrome-twitter-extension-tweetpage#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cryer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancryer.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just written another Google Chrome extension, this time a little more complex. It&#8217;s a Twitter &#8216;Tweet This Page&#8217; extension, much like the many available bookmarklets, except this one allows you to tweet directly from within the extension, without leaving the site you&#8217;re on to go to twitter.com. You&#8217;ll need to log into Twitter the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just written another Google Chrome extension, this time a little more complex. It&#8217;s a Twitter &#8216;Tweet This Page&#8217; extension, much like the many available bookmarklets, except this one allows you to tweet directly from within the extension, without leaving the site you&#8217;re on to go to twitter.com. You&#8217;ll need to log into Twitter the first time you use it, but after that, simply click the button, alter the tweet as you desire, and submit.</p>
<p>You can <a href="/files/extensions/tweetpage/tweetpage.crx">download the extension here</a>, automatic updates are enabled, so you should get new versions as and when I put them up. Please be aware that this extension is quite rough around the edges, (and quite spectacularly ugly,) so please let me know if you manage to break it!</p>
<p>If you choose to use the extension, please let me know, either by commenting below&#8230; or by tweeting this page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dancryer.com/2009/10/google-chrome-twitter-extension-tweetpage/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
